A major nail in the coffin for Homeopathy was an analysis of 110 homeopathy trials and 110 matched conventional-medicine trials published in The Lancet in 2005 that concluded “the clinical effects of homeopathy are placebo effects”. It found homeopathic treatments were not more effective than dummy pills, but allopathic medicine were. Here are two modern research papers for your consideration, please refer to any one: 1. Comparative study of placebo-controlled trials of homoeopathy and allopathy.(2005) http://ift.tt/1Zijill 2. Smith K (2012). "Homeopathy is Unscientific and Unethical". Bioethics 26 (9): 508–512. http://ift.tt/1zCmjyD January 09, 2016 at 07:21PM

A major nail in the coffin for Homeopathy was an analysis of 110 homeopathy trials and 110 matched conventional-medicine trials published in The Lancet in 2005 that concluded “the clinical effects of homeopathy are placebo effects”. It found homeopathic treatments were not more effective than dummy pills, but allopathic medicine were. Here are two modern research papers for your consideration, please refer to any one: 1. Comparative study of placebo-controlled trials of homoeopathy and allopathy.(2005) http://ift.tt/1Zijill 2. Smith K (2012). "Homeopathy is Unscientific and Unethical". Bioethics 26 (9): 508–512. http://ift.tt/1zCmjyD
by Aditya Chourasiya

January 09, 2016 at 07:21PM
from Facebook
via IFTTTfrom Facebook
via IFTTT